@BonesOfTheMoonM to InsanePeopleFacebook • 4 months agoSovcit got their fake plates.imagemessage-square36arrow-up1107arrow-down12
arrow-up1105arrow-down1imageSovcit got their fake plates.@BonesOfTheMoonM to InsanePeopleFacebook • 4 months agomessage-square36
minus-squareFlying Squidlink13•4 months agoIf you’re going to claim something is an inalienable right, learn that “inalienable” is the word you are supposed to use.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•4 months agoHate to defend a sovcit, but “unalienable” is a valid synonym of inalienable and was used in the Declaration of Independence
minus-squareFlying Squidlink5•4 months agoUnalienable was a popular word at the time but less so now: https://www.dictionary.com/e/unalienable-vs-inalienable/ Regardless, it was more of an address of the hyphen.
minus-squareDarkThoughtslinkfedilink0•4 months ago Hate to defend a sovcit Why? They showed ignorance on the same or contextually even worse level, while pushing some sort of “gotcha” moment.
If you’re going to claim something is an inalienable right, learn that “inalienable” is the word you are supposed to use.
But it was grated by their creator!
That guy grates
Hate to defend a sovcit, but “unalienable” is a valid synonym of inalienable and was used in the Declaration of Independence
Grated.
Blased.
Unalienable was a popular word at the time but less so now: https://www.dictionary.com/e/unalienable-vs-inalienable/
Regardless, it was more of an address of the hyphen.
Why? They showed ignorance on the same or contextually even worse level, while pushing some sort of “gotcha” moment.
Them fail English? That’s unpossible!