Difference is though that random companies aren’t allowed to use your number (unless for employment purposes). It’s also just the identifier to your person, not identification. So providing this number is not enough to prove that you are you, by law at least. Additional identification such as your id are required.
It’s not. Often the SSN alone is used for identification, which is why it’s such a big deal if it leaks somewhere. And random companies can use it as well afaik, increasing the odds that it leaks online.
Difference is though that random companies aren’t allowed to use your number (unless for employment purposes). It’s also just the identifier to your person, not identification. So providing this number is not enough to prove that you are you, by law at least. Additional identification such as your id are required.
True, but your saying this implies that this is NOT the case in the US?
It’s not. Often the SSN alone is used for identification, which is why it’s such a big deal if it leaks somewhere. And random companies can use it as well afaik, increasing the odds that it leaks online.
https://sites.psu.edu/rclaes/2020/10/15/rcl4-advertising-gone-wrong/ Here’s an interesting article about a CEO of a company specialising in identity protection being so confident in his services, that he printed his actual SSN in an advertisement.
He had his identity stolen 13 times shortly afterwards.