• Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    34
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Ooooh, i love this idiot! It overlaps my historical leather working hobby with my hatred of pseudohistorical bullshit.

    So, a 30m diameter sphere contains 14.000m3 of gas. Every liter of hydrogen lifts 1.14 grams, and for helium it’s 1.05 grams. So 14.000m3 = 14 million liters, or about 14 million grams, which is 14 tons. Sounds pretty decent until you realize that animal hide isn’t exactly weightless.

    A tanned cowhide, before it’s split, is over 4cm thick. Vegetable tanned cattlehide weighs something like 40 kg for a 5m2. But lets see how thick out balloon is. If it can lift 6 tons, it can only weigh some 8000kg itself. Our 30m sphere has a surface area of some 2800m2, so that means our animal hides can weigh, at most, 8000/2800=2.8kg per square meter. Those at home have probably noticed that 2.8 is a bit less than the 8kg you need to use cowhide.

    So, what kind of leather or hide were those balloons then? Well leather is usually sold in “ounces per square foot” (even in Europe), so we can just look it up. 2.8kg per square meter is about 9.2 ounce per square foot (says wolfram alpha), and a handy table I have printed says that’s around 3.6mm thick.

    So, we are too believe that the Egyptians made a 30m balloon, out of what is basically cheap-belt and saddlebag leather, somehow got that not just air-tight, while being ridiculously thin, and then used it to build massive structures.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      I will note there is historic precedent for using gut, not hide, for lifting gas envelopes. Airship R101 had gut gas bags.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      Not just air-tight, lighter-than-air-tight. I’m not sure if it’s true for the whole set of lighter-than-air gasses, but helium is infamously difficult to keep from leaking, even with modern technology.

      Good at making gasses behave is a weird choice for ancient technologies we lost.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        Hydrogen is even worse. It basically moves through solid steel cylinders.

    • @Tyfud
      link
      5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Do they need to do that before, or after they learn how to harness a tremendous amount of hydrogen? Which they conveniently forgot to mention anywhere.

      You also think that they would have made a few pictures of that happening, instead of the pictures they did make, which clearly show manual slave labor building the pyramids.

    • @Valmond
      link
      13 months ago

      Hah gain even more lifting power and also sidestep the whole need of creating helium by filling it with vacuum!

      \s if needed 🤷🏻‍♀️

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      i think they would likely be using intestines or cow stomachs as did the rigid airships of the time, as it was the only material that could hold back hydrogen, so that would’ve been an option. Especially with leather production, though someone would have to have thought about it first.

      I’m not sure either hydrogegn OR helium would’ve been accessible at the time, though if we’re tying to logically analyze this, its probably worth considering they would’ve alleviated like 80% the mass of the stone, and not all of it, as it’s a little redundant to make the thing float.