TikTok on Thursday pushed back against U.S. government arguments that the popular social media platform is not shielded by the First Amendment, comparing its platform to prominent American media organizations owned by foreign entities.

Last month, the Justice Department argued in a legal brief filed in a Washington federal appeals court that neither TikTok’s China-based parent company, ByteDance, nor the platform’s global and U.S. arms — TikTok Ltd. and TikTok Inc. — were entitled to First Amendment protections because they are “foreign organizations operating abroad” or owned by one.

TikTok attorneys have made the First Amendment a key part of their legal challenge to the federal law requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok to an approved buyer or face a ban.

  • @Eldritch
    link
    English
    426 days ago

    Where has the US government done anything regarding them? There hasn’t even been a uniform response from University to university. And the ones in particular that you’re talking about look like they’re going to be facing some pretty decent fines and fuck around and find out repercussions. There’s already been one administrator that’s lost their position if I remember correctly. But that should only be the start. Still that’s not the US government.

    • @kurwa
      link
      226 days ago

      They lost their position because they weren’t hard enough on students. Cops raided many universities, breaking up protests and arresting students. California is passing an anti protesting law. Congress literally called in University leaders for questioning the “anti semitism” on their campuses. The only reason universities did anything against the protests in the first place is because of the pro Israel position of the US government.