@return2ozma to LeftismEnglish • edit-24 months agoOur Verdict on Kamala Harris’s New Plans - Jacobinjacobin.comexternal-linkmessage-square7arrow-up122arrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up19arrow-down1external-linkOur Verdict on Kamala Harris’s New Plans - Jacobinjacobin.com@return2ozma to LeftismEnglish • edit-24 months agomessage-square7cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish8•4 months agoI don’t want “most are meh,” but I’ll take it over genocidal dictatorship.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•4 months agoWhy is that the choice we need to make? What stopped her from coming up with an economic plan that was better? Why did she need to include the parts that were actively bad?
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish3•4 months agoBecause, like it or not, there are only two possible people who will be in the Oval Office next year and one is a genocidal dictator.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-2•4 months agoHow does that stop Harris from coming up with a sound economic plan? Doesn’t that make it even more important that she present a good plan?
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish2•4 months agoI never said it did stop her. I said, and I quote: I don’t want “most are meh,” but I’ll take it over genocidal dictatorship.
I don’t want “most are meh,” but I’ll take it over genocidal dictatorship.
Why is that the choice we need to make?
What stopped her from coming up with an economic plan that was better?
Why did she need to include the parts that were actively bad?
Because, like it or not, there are only two possible people who will be in the Oval Office next year and one is a genocidal dictator.
How does that stop Harris from coming up with a sound economic plan?
Doesn’t that make it even more important that she present a good plan?
I never said it did stop her. I said, and I quote: