• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    You’re right, the Soviet Union joined the allies against the Nazis because they were explicitly not revolutionary defeatists, which cannot be said of a large number of modern day tankies.

    • carl_marks[use name]
      link
      fedilink
      -31 month ago

      “Tankie” functions for libs the same way, as “woke” does for chuds. It’s a meaningless term

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        And libs often seems to function for tankies in exactly the same way. I’m an anarchist but when I argue with tankies I get called a lib even as I call for the overthrow of capitalism. Funny how that works, almost as if the problem is dogmatism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            So does “tankie” and “woke.” I used mine correctly, you are indeed a tankie. When a chud calls a left-wing political activist woke, at least they’re using it correctly, even if they don’t necessarily know that they are.

            You called me a liberal for - let me check - opposing imperialism regardless of who’s doing it. Interesting, do you think that fits the definition?

            • carl_marks[use name]
              link
              fedilink
              01 month ago

              So does “tankie” and “woke.”

              Could you kindly defone that for me?

              You called me a liberal

              Where? Lol funny how you get that feeling I talked about you