EDIT: For clarification, I feel that the current situation on the ground in the war (vs. say a year ago) might indicate that an attack on Russia might not result in instant nuclear war, which is what prompted my question. I am well aware of the “instant nuclear Armageddon” opinion.

Serious question. I don’t need to be called stupid. I realize nuclear war is bad. Thanks!

    • Jimmybander
      link
      fedilink
      81 month ago

      NATO would ensure that the US is involved. We’re aligned with the Europeans.

      • @AndrewZabar
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        Doesn’t Drumpf plan to remove us from NATO? Or am I remembering wrongly what I read?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          Trump probably gets rock hard at the idea of having an excuse to hit the nuke button so leaving NATO wouldn’t even be a deal breaker

          • @AndrewZabar
            link
            English
            130 days ago

            He will never see a second in prison, don’t kid yourself.

              • @AndrewZabar
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                30 days ago

                Personally, I wish that jackass who shot his ear had been a better shot. What a waste of such an opportunity.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 month ago

      Even without US. UK has nukes, France has nukes. You don’t need a lot to destroy Russia. Basically just two.