Angry Russians displaced after Ukraine crossed the border and invaded the Kursk region last week have vented their frustrations online to President Vladimir Putin.

The criticisms represent an unusually public show of defiance in a country where any cracks at the leader or military can draw harsh punishments.

  • g0zer
    link
    English
    44 months ago

    It’s not a 14 page paper, it’s two references to widely known historical events. I feel like I’m going insane…

    Prompt: In 1-2 sentences, summarize the Russian revolution”s impact on social unrest.

    Responses: Amidst widespread dissatisfaction with the Tsarist regime due to economic hardship, military failures, and political repression, the Russian people ultimately overthrew a centuries-old monarchy.

    I’m not saying “create me a story about Russian people revolting”. I’m taking an event I’m already aware of and asking for it to get boiled down to a simple statement.

    I would know if it’s lying because I paid attention in high school and college & I know what the Russian revolution is.

    This is being blown way out of proportion because people see “LLM” and freak out. I use LLMs constantly in my day to day life for shit like this (and I’m not going to stop). I also feed it things I’ve written and ask it to check grammar and tighten it up. The LLM isn’t “creating” anything in those cases either, it’s just making things easier to read/understand; acting as an editor.

    Sorry if that scares you.

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      34 months ago

      It doesn’t scare me. I just see no reason to trust LLMs after all the lies. There are plenty of legitimate sources that could be quoted.

      • g0zer
        link
        English
        24 months ago

        A People’s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution: 1891-1924.

        Orlando Figes, 1998

        Go read it and tell me what you learn; happy?

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          24 months ago

          Believe it or not, there is a huge gulf between “paste what a lying sentence construction machine says” and “require people to go to the right library.”

          But of course, that would require you to be arguing in good faith.

          • g0zer
            link
            English
            14 months ago

            Lmao, we aren’t talking about some obscure, niche topic. You asked for a source and I gave you one…

            Stop moving the goalposts; if anyone is arguing in bad faith it’s you my friend.

            Google “russian revolution 1917” and read the first academic article you see. Your lack of research is not my responsibility…

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              04 months ago

              I never moved the goalposts. If you can’t figure out how to paste text from and then link to a couple of websites on the subject or even Wikipedia and thus rely on the thing that tells people to put glue on pizza, don’t be surprised if you’re criticized for it.

              • g0zer
                link
                English
                24 months ago

                I’m perfectly capable of pasting a link to a website; I chose to use a source from a book I read in college and is sitting on a shelf at my house.

                I’m not obligated to do a Google search for you.

                And again, the LLM isn’t doing my research for me; it’s summarizing an event that I’m already aware of.

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  04 months ago

                  I’m afraid you don’t understand how the burden of proof works. I’d give you an easy link to understand it, but someone told me recently, “I’m not obligated to do a Google search for you.”

                  • g0zer
                    link
                    English
                    24 months ago

                    If you can’t be bothered to spend 5 mins looking something up then you’re welcome to believe whatever you want.

                    This isn’t a court case, we’re having a conversation in an Internet forum. What you’re calling a “burden of proof”, I’m choosing to call intellectual laziness.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I find it extremely difficult to believe two events over 70 years apart that I know are very different in many ways could ultimately have the same underlying cause.

      And as you haven’t actually made a point, just asserted they do, there’s no reason to believe they do. LLM or not

      • g0zer
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t know what to tell you. You can pretty easily look up the agreed upon causes of two pretty impactful and well known historical events. We aren’t talking about some small conflict in some small village in sub-Saharan Africa; the events in question are the Russian revolution and fall of the Soviet Union.

        I’m sure you can find dissenting opinions, but what I commented is largely agreed upon.

        Had I not been honest about using LLMs to summarize a few sentences, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion. If you want to play devils advocate, provide a differing opinion. Your only hang up seems to be that I used a LLM in any capacity.

        I’m not even saying it’s the only cause, just that it contributed…