A Milwaukee woman has been jailed for 11 years for killing the man that prosecutors said had sex trafficked her as a teenager.

The sentence, issued on Monday, ends a six-year legal battle for Chrystul Kizer, now 24, who had argued she should be immune from prosecution.

Kizer was charged with reckless homicide for shooting Randall Volar, 34, in 2018 when she was 17. She accepted a plea deal earlier this year to avoid a life sentence.

Volar had been filming his sexual abuse of Kizer for more than a year before he was killed.

Kizer said she met Volar when she was 16, and that the man sexually assaulted her while giving her cash and gifts. She said he also made money by selling her to other men for sex.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -34 months ago

    I’m certain that even the worst lawyer in history would have considered this angle if it were viable.

    • @thejoker954
      link
      54 months ago

      I dont know how it could be argued anyone was in their right mind after going through what she went through.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -14 months ago

        Obviously she wasn’t in her “right mind” but that doesn’t mean she had no capacity to understand that killing someone is murder.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          Or she decided to end the threat to her before he hurt her again. Self defense is generally not considered murder and rapists get, what, 5 years in prison in this country then go on to rape more? If convicted at all?

          I can easily see where she felt like she had no other choice.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            As I’ve said many times, her actions are understandable and in her situation I’d probably do the same, cognisant that I would face the consequences of my crime.

            You can frame her actions as self defense if you wish, but they do not meet the legal definition of self defense because there was no clear and present threat to her person at the time she planned and perpetrated the murder.