Unruffled [he/him]M to Lefty [email protected]English • 4 months agoFixed it for yacdn.masto.hostimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1530arrow-down118file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1512arrow-down1imageFixed it for yacdn.masto.hostUnruffled [he/him]M to Lefty [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square83fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-24 months agoYes you are: “We” cannot stop human beings from gaining power over others so the question is moot.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•4 months agoI see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase: “We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoNo one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•4 months ago No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation. You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•4 months agoSo you admit it’s personal rather than topical, cool.
I’m neither saying nor implying that.
Yes you are:
I see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase:
“We” cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.
No one’s talking about power itself, but of its’ monopolisation.
Why can’t that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?
You’re not making any sense. We’re not communicating. Take care.
Got it, you’re refusing to engage.
With you only.
So you admit it’s personal rather than topical, cool.
LOL