For me, it may be that the toilet paper roll needs to have the open end away from the wall. I don’t want to reach under the roll to take a piece! That’s ludicrous!

That or my recent addiction to correcting people when they use “less” when they should use “fewer”

  • @SgtAStrawberry
    link
    33 months ago

    Should a random assortment website without a specific country focus use something like .net or .world or do you have any better ideas, .world should probably be reserved for websites with world related stuff.

    I’m genuinely interested in hearing your thoughts on this and similar. I find your hill very intresting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      .org was always intended for miscellaneous sites that don’t fit anywhere else, I think that’s the most appropriate. I mainly remember this from back in “the day” but here’s a source I’ve just found to back me up: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1591

      I’m not a big fan of the “new” generic TLDs like .world, they’re not part of my hill, I don’t really care what they’re used for but I think we could do without them. Most Lemmy instances should really be .org in my ideal scheme of things.

      • @SgtAStrawberry
        link
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Intresting I didn’t know that about .org

        Also very intresting document you found thank you for sharing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Not true, .org was supposed to be for non-profit organisations, with .gov and .com for other government and commercial entities.