Noa Argamani, an Israeli woman freed from Hamas captivity in Gaza in June, said on Friday that her injuries were caused by an Israeli air strike during her rescue operation, not by a Hamas attack.

Speaking to diplomats from G7 countries in Tokyo on Wednesday, Argamani detailed her ordeal after she was taken captive by Palestinian armed groups during the 7 October attack. However, two days later, she issued a statement on Instagram, saying that some of her remarks had been misquoted and taken out of context.

Contrary to some Israeli media reports, Argamani clarified that she was not beaten or had her hair shaved by Palestinian fighters.

“[Hamas members] did not hit me while I was in captivity, nor did they cut my hair; I was injured by the collapse of a wall caused by an [Israeli] Air Force pilot,” she added.

  • @SloppyPuppy
    link
    -22
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    She was beaten by hammas. The bruises she had when she was rescued were from the rescue probably or from some IDF bombing. From this people are trying to portray as if she was treated well in captivity as if she was some prisoner of war held with good conditions.

      • @SloppyPuppy
        link
        -619 days ago

        Please point to what exactly is wrong in what I said.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          She was beaten by hammas.

          She clearly said, she wasn’t.

          … bruces from the rescue… probably

          your subjective speculation.

          • @SloppyPuppy
            link
            -819 days ago

            I uhh dont even know how can this be… You have her video saying she was beat by hammas “She clearly said she wasnt”

            I just cant. Sorry.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              8
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Can you not grasp how a “clarifying statement” works? How many people need to tell you that the original was taken out of context, so the woman clarified that it wasn’t what she actually said. Do you know what context is, bud?