• @Legendsofanus
    link
    11 year ago

    Wow image-hosting is a thing. Why don’t they just have something so essential out of the box, is it expensive or something

    • Choco1ateCh1p
      link
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It requires a lot of storage space. Much more than for just text.

      Also, additional liability for hosting images uploaded by literally anyone, that could depict abuse, or be copyrighted.

      • @Legendsofanus
        link
        21 year ago

        Ahh so if somebody did that, the blame would fall on the site that has the image posted

    • @thecdc1995
      link
      21 year ago

      Short answer is yes. Long answer is that with text it’s much easier to stamp out illegal activity because keyword searches are cheap while semantic searches in images are pretty good but extremely computationally expensive. You can’t just scan for illegal activity in images the same way you can nigh instantly scan a body of text for “illegal-site.com”.

      • @Legendsofanus
        link
        11 year ago

        That makes a certain kind of sense but does that mean the filtering algorithm Facebook uses that targets NSFW photos in posts and group chats is very complicated and expensive? is it important for a site like reddit or Lemmy to scan for illegal activities oj a photo?