I expect lemmy.ml to be hugged to death, but that’s just a DoS.

More interestingly would be how the activitypub network reacts under reddit-like loads and behaviour, and as i understand it, things shouldnt be too bad?

Is lemmy scalable?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    I’ve tested running multiple instances of pict-rs using distributed storage (Moosefs) for the uploaded file directory. I ran into several weird issues. Mainly that images would not load, or end up broken. But then refresh the page and hit a different pict-rs instance and it worked for some images, but broke for others. So now I run a single pict-rs instance, still on distributed storage, but everything works. This is on the 3x branch. I believe the 4x branch is still in rc stage.

    • @PriorProject
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I’ve tested running multiple instances of pict-rs using distributed storage [and] ran into several weird issues.

      Well that’s a bummer.

      At the very least, a Lemmy install is comprised of at least 4 discrete processes. I have to think that putting lemmy, lemmy-ui, pict-rs (backed by object-storage to provide scaleable I/O and let the pict-rs host focus on CPU), and PG (optionally with additional read-replicas) on separate boxes would result in a hardware platform that outscales the current codebase for a year or two while they clean up perf issues that crop up with large user/post/comment/community counts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        That’s basically what I’m doing. A singleton instance for Pict-rs and Postgres. Multiple compute nodes for Lemmy and Lemmy-ui being accessed over load balancers. All of data is placed on distributed storage so I can quickly fail-over Pict-rs or Postgres if needed. It’s enough for now, though I don’t think it could handle Reddit levels of traffic.