dantheclamman to Not The OnionEnglish • 24 days agoKentucky State Fair removes ribbon-winning miniature after realizing it depicted a porn setnypost.commessage-square88arrow-up1581arrow-down15
arrow-up1576arrow-down1external-linkKentucky State Fair removes ribbon-winning miniature after realizing it depicted a porn setnypost.comdantheclamman to Not The OnionEnglish • 24 days agomessage-square88
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish5•24 days agoThey’re allowed to be as upset as they like. People get upset about all sorts of silly things. That doesn’t mean they need to be catered to. And what do you mean your inbox?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-4•24 days agoSo you acknowledge their feelings but you wish them harm, got it.
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish5•24 days agoWhat are you even talking about? People are offended by statues of Martin Luther King, Jr. Should we take them down because those people are upset?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•24 days agoTolerance for all except the intolerant. Porn sets aren’t a protected class but keep ypur hopes up for the year 2412
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish3•23 days agoDude, you’re literally embodying a Simpsons episode which already came true.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-5•edit-223 days agoI want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circuimstance. I made a comment earlier about how dressing a Naiad Statue up as a hooker changes the context of the artwork significantly.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-2•23 days agoGetting mad that some other guy’s porn set miniature can’t be left on public display is weird, mate.
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish2•23 days agoThis isn’t porn, it’s a hand-crafted miniature. Which, yes, is art.
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish1•23 days agoYes, I read it. That doesn’t make it not art. Michelangelo’s David is a depiction of a nude man. Furthermore, Piss Christ, the controversial photo of a crucifix suspended inside urine is also art. You are not the arbiter of what is art.
They’re allowed to be as upset as they like. People get upset about all sorts of silly things. That doesn’t mean they need to be catered to.
And what do you mean your inbox?
So you acknowledge their feelings but you wish them harm, got it.
What are you even talking about?
People are offended by statues of Martin Luther King, Jr. Should we take them down because those people are upset?
Tolerance for all except the intolerant. Porn sets aren’t a protected class but keep ypur hopes up for the year 2412
Dude, you’re literally embodying a Simpsons episode which already came true.
I want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circuimstance.
I made a comment earlier about how dressing a Naiad Statue up as a hooker changes the context of the artwork significantly.
You’re being fucking weird, mate
LMAO
Getting mad that some other guy’s porn set miniature can’t be left on public display is weird, mate.
Whatever you say, weirdo.
This isn’t porn, it’s a hand-crafted miniature. Which, yes, is art.
Yes, I read it. That doesn’t make it not art.
Michelangelo’s David is a depiction of a nude man.
Furthermore, Piss Christ, the controversial photo of a crucifix suspended inside urine is also art.
You are not the arbiter of what is art.