• @brygphilomena
    link
    84 months ago

    Reality is nuances and America is big. Like REALLY big. I don’t think a lot of the policies that are important to big cities make as much sense in rural areas and vice versa.

    There are big pictures issues, like women’s rights, gay rights, and trans rights that need to be protected across the country.

    Then there are gun control policies that don’t make a lot of sense in towns of 300 people but seem like common sense in cities with millions of people.

    Personally, I believe we need to work on cutting out the people and saboteurs who are willfully, vehemently, and incessantly trying to divide us. Those that are doing their damnedest to try and make each other the enemy.

    • @Harvey656
      link
      44 months ago

      Hard agree.

      As someone that grew up most of my life in a tiny, rural Ohio area. There are so many strange laws that extend from the cities, many of which can outright just be bad for the area.

      Policy wise, local democrats are rarely liked and seen as weak in rural areas, which in my experience is usually correct, unfortunately. The Republicans are always money grabbers but generally get things done.

      Frankly the system sucks.

      • @brygphilomena
        link
        74 months ago

        Honestly, it’s wild when I get into a policy debate and from someone’s stance I can tell whether they live in a city, in the country, in suburbs, or whatever. Its hard to argue policy when people refuse to acknowledge that there are other parts of the country that aren’t like the neighborhood they live in.

        From my understanding, which I admit could be flawed, that is why there is the separation of federal, state, and local government.

        Federal deals with the big shit across the country but doesn’t get caught up in the small shit that only applies to Montana. It also acts as the check and balance to state laws to prevent them from being too egregious.

        • @Harvey656
          link
          44 months ago

          Yeah, I think that’s how the separation is supposed to work. That being said, seems like the supreme court keeps poking it’s nose where it doesn’t belong. But all I can really do is complain on a lesser used website and vote.

          Also, side note, how is Montana? I live in Texas atm, cause I followed my fiance down here, and it sucks. But we eventually want to get a house and may not stay here.

          • @brygphilomena
            link
            24 months ago

            I recently moved from California to Illinois.

            I just used Montana since it’s a low population density state.

            I mostly liked California. Other than the CARB restrictions on cars, most of its legislation just let me live my life in peace. But liking to modify cars put me at odds with the emissions laws. It’s not like I was poluting heavily, it’s just that I needed a custom tune to burn fuel efficiently when I had done an engine swap. They won’t even measure the emissions anymore and just have “approved” ECU codes they test for. California is just very expensive, too expensive for buying a home for me right now.

            Illinois is good too, at least in the Chicago suburbs. I can hop on a train and go downtown any time I want, I’ve got good schools, good community, and lots to do.

            • @Harvey656
              link
              24 months ago

              I’ll have to look into Illinois, I’m originally from Ohio, and oh boy let me tell you, I hate Columbus. It’s practically half of the state at this point. And that sucks, the extended area is seriously changing how Ohio looks, so many suburbs, so many factories.