David GerardM to [email protected]English • edit-24 months agoCopilot AI calls journalist a child abuser, Microsoft tries to launder responsibilitypivot-to-ai.comexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1192arrow-down11
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkCopilot AI calls journalist a child abuser, Microsoft tries to launder responsibilitypivot-to-ai.comDavid GerardM to [email protected]English • edit-24 months agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-24 months ago The details of how the software was programmed should be legally irrelevant. Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•4 months ago Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program. Too many degrees of separation between a programmer and the final product and how it’s used, usually. Additionally, the decision to deploy an incomplete product or one that contains known flaws is an administrative decision, not a programming one.
Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.
Too many degrees of separation between a programmer and the final product and how it’s used, usually.
Additionally, the decision to deploy an incomplete product or one that contains known flaws is an administrative decision, not a programming one.