and that completely justifies any and all warcrimes against civilians? Even if they were doing the same to the other side it still wouldnt justify this.
I said:
“and that completely justifies any and all warcrimes against civilians?”
and your response was:
“That justifies war, yes.
War sucks and people get killed. Now grow up.”
So did you mean that warcrimes are inherently part of war and something that should just be accepted or what did you mean? Or did you mean it just shouldnt be discussed or be outraged about? Without further information there is very little to go on to get any other conclusions that are not in the line of what i asked.
and that completely justifies any and all warcrimes against civilians? Even if they were doing the same to the other side it still wouldnt justify this.
That justifies war, yes.
War sucks and people get killed. Now grow up.
So killing and torturing civilians is ok in your book no matter what? Because that was what i have issue with in this matter.
How did you reach this conclusion? Did I say that? Don’t put words in my mouth.
I said: “and that completely justifies any and all warcrimes against civilians?” and your response was: “That justifies war, yes. War sucks and people get killed. Now grow up.”
So did you mean that warcrimes are inherently part of war and something that should just be accepted or what did you mean? Or did you mean it just shouldnt be discussed or be outraged about? Without further information there is very little to go on to get any other conclusions that are not in the line of what i asked.