The territorial violation by China is the latest in a series of events amplifying tensions between Beijing and Japan.

A Chinese military surveillance plane breached Japanese airspace off the country’s southwestern coast on Monday, marking what Japan’s defense ministry described as the first known incursion by China’s military into its territorial airspace.

According to a ministry official, a Chinese reconnaissance aircraft briefly entered Japanese territory near Nagasaki Prefecture around 11:30 a.m. on Monday. In response, Japan’s Self-Defense Force put fighter jets on high alert and issued a warning to the Chinese aircraft.

While Chinese planes frequently appear in international airspace around Japan, this incident represents the first confirmed entry of a military aircraft into Japan’s territorial airspace.

  • @NOT_RICK
    link
    English
    2918 days ago

    Very possible it was just an inexperienced/behind schedule pilot cutting corners on the route.

    In a vacuum, maybe. In the context of how China has been acting towards nearly all of their neighbors recently, not likely. This reeks of wolf warrior diplomacy.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      -3718 days ago

      In the context of how China has been acting towards nearly all of their neighbors

      The Western reporting coverage of Chinese military operations is slanted to paint China as an aggressor, in the same way Western reporting of Iraq in the early 2000s was slanted to paint Iraqis as terrorists.

      You don’t read about American military aircraft invading Japanese airspace because Japan is occupied territory. You don’t read about Taiwanese aircraft invading Chinese airspace, because there’s no defined territorial line between them on account of Taiwan being contested territory.

      This reeks of wolf warrior diplomacy.

      China sending a single Rambo-esque supersoldier in to liberate native peoples from an evil mercenary army?

      • @cm0002
        link
        English
        25
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        The Western reporting coverage of Chinese military operations is slanted to paint China as an aggressor

        China is literally aggressive in both active and passive ways, maybe some news outlets are exaggerating a little for clicks, but it’s not by much

        You don’t read about American military aircraft invading Japanese airspace because Japan is occupied territory.

        Japan isn’t “occupied territory” they are a US ally who allows us to have a base there for rapid response and protection.

        You don’t read about Taiwanese aircraft invading Chinese airspace, because there’s no defined territorial line between them on account of Taiwan being contested territory.

        Lol, nah, Taiwan is a country the only one contesting it is China in the same way that Russia is “contesting” that Ukraine is their territory.

        This reeks of wolf warrior diplomacy.

        China sending a single Rambo-esque supersoldier in to liberate native peoples from an evil mercenary army?

        1. It’s called strategic boundary pushing China has been known to do such things with their other neighbors

        2. You reek of a China apologist

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          English
          -2618 days ago

          China is literally aggressive in both active and passive ways

          Are we doing the “Chinese Weather Balloon” hysteria again?

          Japan isn’t “occupied territory” they are a US ally

          Starting in which year?

          Taiwan is a country the only one contesting it is China

          Where does Taiwanese airspace end and Chinese airspace begin? Would it surprise you to discover that Taiwan claims airspace over the south end of China?

          I know folks on here love making the “East Taiwan” joke, but are you seriously going to argue that Xiamen and Fuzhou are also part of Taiwan?

          It’s called strategic boundary pushing

          • @assassin_aragorn
            link
            English
            1918 days ago

            Are we doing the “Chinese Weather Balloon” hysteria again?

            If the US sent a bunch of weather balloons into Chinese airspace without any warning and they approached government and military sites, would you say the same thing?

            Without explicit permission from the government it is a breach of sovereignty. The US had the right to annihilate all of those balloons the instant they passed into US airspace – just like China has the right to destroy the hypothetical US balloons as soon as they pass into Chinese airspace.

            For how often China beats the drum about sovereignty, they should know this.

            • @UnderpantsWeevil
              link
              English
              -1318 days ago

              If the US sent a bunch of weather balloons into Chinese airspace without any warning

              China claimed Monday that the United States flew spy balloons into Chinese airspace more than 10 times since January 2022 without Beijing’s permission, accusations that further ratcheted up tensions between the two countries amid mutual allegations of surveillance.

              The US had the right to annihilate all of those balloons the instant they passed into US airspace

              The US feds panicked at the bad press and created a rain of falling debris over South Carolina. Heck of a job.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                117 days ago

                It was over the waters of South Carolina since recovery was paramount. If they panicked theyd of shot it down over cow landia somewhere in the great planes.

              • @assassin_aragorn
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                And China would’ve been completely in the right if they shot those balloons down. It was a violation of their sovereignty. An ironic one, considering China did it first, but nonetheless, it enters their airspace without permission. China would be totally justified in shooting them down. I’m not sure why you think this is some sort of gotcha.

                Additionally, they didn’t panic at bad press. They were waiting for the balloon to clear land so that when they shot it down, the debris wouldn’t rain down on anyone.

                Once again, if these were truly just weather balloons for research, the university conducting the research and the Chinese government are incredibly negligent for not at least informing the US. For innocuous scientific research, there should be no problem with open communication.

          • @NOT_RICK
            link
            English
            14
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            Why does this picture place a US military base in Hong Kong?

            Edit: also, identification zone =/= claimed airspace

          • @cm0002
            link
            English
            518 days ago

            Are we doing the “Chinese Weather Balloon” hysteria again?

            Ah yea, when people are concerned when a near-hostile country sends over unknown aircraft unannounced it’s just “hysteria”. Not like those weather balloons are perfectly capable of carrying bombs or biowarfare contagions or anything…

            Starting in which year?

            April 28, 1952 when the San Francisco Peace Treaty that was signed on September 8, 1951 went into effect.

            Here’s a wikipedia article all about US-Japan relations since you appear to have flunked highschool history

            • @UnderpantsWeevil
              link
              English
              -117 days ago

              a near-hostile country sends over unknown aircraft

              A country’s biggest trading partner losing control of a very-well-established-as-weather-balloon aircraft.

              April 28, 1952 when the San Francisco Peace Treaty that was signed on September 8, 1951 went into effect.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_Course

              Fascinating stuff for a fully democratic and not-at-all militarily occupied country to undergo. If you’re into Wikipedia articles, you should give it a read. Full consolidation of economic power under a few US-loyal Zaibatsus that dominate the country into the modern day. Rearming of a police force loyal to the occupying US government, which was dedicated to busting up unions and crippling the nascent labor-rights movement in the country. And rapid expansion of military bases, in the run up to the US invasion and aerial bombardment of the Korean Peninsula.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1618 days ago

        You don’t read about American military aircraft invading Japanese airspace because Japan is occupied territory.

        Least delusional tankie

      • @NOT_RICK
        link
        English
        1518 days ago

        China’s actions paint them as an aggressor.

        You’re right that you don’t read about the US military invading Japanese territory as they are invited by the Japanese government. Countries are free to repeal that invitation just like Niger.

        And no, I’m not referencing a movie.

      • @scarabic
        link
        English
        418 days ago

        Dude what? China’s near-daily incursions over Taiwan have escalated and escalated to an objectively ridiculous level. Nobody “painting” shit.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          English
          017 days ago

          China’s near-daily incursions over Taiwan

          This is what we’re defining as an “incursion over Taiwan”.