It seems i have the option but i have a vague memory of someone telling me not to bother with it unless i had a good reason

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    214 months ago

    If your devices all support WPA3, go for it. There’s a good chance older things won’t.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      Most routers include backwards compatibility with WPA2 as a fallback, while newer devices will use WPA3. Should be relatively seamless

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        134 months ago

        The drawback is that evildoers can still attack the WPA2 handshakes and can force devices to downgrade, so you’re still getting effectively WPA2 level security until you actually turn off WPA2.

        But if it doesn’t cost you anything, you can just turn it on and make their life just s little bit harder.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 months ago

          Maybe vlan or DMZ a wpa2 network and use wpa3 with no fallback to wpa2 on the main/lan network?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            In my case that would mean that over 70% would be in the DMZ… It would be the main network

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              Yeah but as long as important data is not able to be accessed via the wpa2 network then you are all good.

      • femtech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        When I put my network on wpa3/2 mode my Xbox would not longer connect.

          • femtech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            Yeah, it’s on my list to run some Ethernet from my basement to the attic. Right now I have one wire running up the outside of the wall to the AP.