• @Madison420
      link
      103 months ago

      It’s not lying at all, omission is only a lie if it’s misleading or nefarious, this is neither.

    • @MiltownClowns
      link
      63 months ago

      How so? He broke a strike. I said he broke a strike. It can’t much more factual then that.

        • @MiltownClowns
          link
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Context for a joke? Do you expect context in a Colbert monologue? I’m not sure if that makes it funnier. My point is factually correct. Its a joke, not a new york times article.

        • @MiltownClowns
          link
          2
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I was genuinely curious about your view point. If you lack the convictions to defend your characterization of my statement, and me personally by proxy, then maybe you shouldn’t be calling me a liar with such authority.

            • @MiltownClowns
              link
              33 months ago

              You directly called me a liar and I directly asked why. This is weasle behavior. Do better.

                • @MiltownClowns
                  link
                  53 months ago

                  I asked you a direct question and in response you called me a liar. You impugned my integrity and I asked you to defend it. You telling me to go through your comment history is insufficient after you impugned my integrity. If you want anybody to respect your position, you need to respect other people. Otherwise, you’re just being a dick on the internet. You’re not getting anything done. You’re not changing anybody’s minds. You’re just being an asshole.