Oops.

  • downpunxx
    link
    fedilink
    512 months ago

    The museum told the BBC that “whenever possible, items are displayed without barriers or glass walls”.

    And “despite the rare incident” the museum said it intends to continue this tradition.

    seems like this museum gets what being an educator and servant of the history is all about. what a surprisingly excellent and principled stance, when so many places go the other way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 months ago

      “There are instances where display items are intentionally damaged, and such cases are treated with great severity, including involving the police,” Lihi Laszlo from the museum told the BBC. “In this case, however, this was not the situation. The jar was accidentally damaged by a young child visiting the museum, and the response will be accordingly.”

      They really do get it. They saw it as a risk and accepted it and when the risk manifested itself, they took it in stride and even invited the family back for a guided tour.

    • @halcyoncmdr
      link
      English
      202 months ago

      While I appreciate that approach and think it is a great policy… For things like this I feel like the original should be displayed, but protected and a replica be available for patrons to touch and approach closely. Especially something so rare to find in such good condition. Just make it clear that the replica is a replica specifically so they can touch it and get a good look without risking damage.

      Hiding things behind glass isn’t the best experience, but extremely rare artifacts also need to be protected. Replicas, properly disclosed with an explanation why, are a good compromise.