I asked someone this question before and they said it was a really stupid question and I’m not sure why so thought I would ask it here…

What’s going to happen when AI becomes really advanced? Is there a plan for what all of the displaced people are going to do? Like for example administrative assistance, receptionist, cashiers, office workers, White collar people. Is there going to be some sort of retraining program of some sort to get people cross-trained into other careers like nursing or other careers that have not yet been automated? Or are people just going to lose their homes, be evicted and is there going to be like some sort of mass eviction and homelessness downstream effect because people can’t find any work?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    83 months ago

    He’s saying there’s no proof it is. Like there’s no proof of God. Doesn’t mean it isn’t magically possible but in our reality there isn’t a defined way. If there was we’d be there.

    • @Valmond
      link
      -93 months ago

      He says there is no evidence of possible AGI which is bs IMO.

      • @omarfw
        link
        83 months ago

        What’s the evidence?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That the human brain exists is enough evidence that intelligence is possible. An AGI similar to the human brain is then possible at a minimum

          Can’t say much more than that for sure, but you have a starting point.

          • @UmeU
            link
            13 months ago

            Because intelligence exists, AGI similar to the human brain is possible? Your conclusion does not follow the premise.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              Yes, absolutely. Because at a minimum we can recreate the human brain, as we know the human brain can exist.

              • @UmeU
                link
                23 months ago

                You are talking funny friend… we can NOT recreate the human brain. Maybe someday, but so far it has not been demonstrated to be possible.

                You say that we can recreate the human brain because we know the human brain can exist.

                The sun can exist, can we recreate the sun?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 months ago

                  In theory? Yes. That’s the point. All I’m saying is that it’s not literally impossible, why is it so hard to understand?

                  • @UmeU
                    link
                    13 months ago

                    Because something has not yet been proven to be impossible does not make that thing possible.

                    Speculation alone does not make a thing possible. You cannot claim that something is possible until you have demonstrated that it is indeed possible.

                    All things that have not been proven to be possible have a default state of being impossible until their possibility can be demonstrated.

          • @omarfw
            link
            03 months ago

            So you think it’s an inevitability? Given enough time we will develop one?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              The question wasn’t whether it’s inevitable, but whether it’s possible

              And the answer to whether it’s possible is a clear: Yes, because we already have general intelligence

              But it’s very much not an inevitability, no. Civilization could always collapse before we get to that point, after all

              • @UmeU
                link
                13 months ago

                Just because intelligence exists does not mean it is possible to artificially create general intelligence… we would need some evidence that AGI is possible other than ‘makes sense to me’

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  0
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Well, here we need to specify what “artificial” in this equation means. Because to me it just means “created by humans” (so, not natural processes). It doesn’t say anything about it not being able to be near-identical to natural brains

                  • @UmeU
                    link
                    13 months ago

                    Gibberish, absolute gibberish.