• @MotoAsh
    link
    28
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    One step closer to pregnant men, then the smoothbrained bigots will REALLY be digging for reasons. (I don’t mean the obvious, but like in Junior, the movie)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Pregnant men aren’t the point here. They exist and have an emoji 🫃 already but frankly, FtM people are unlikely to want to get pregnant anyway, it’s undoubtedly feminine and will likely require steps back in hormonal therapy to reduce risk.

      The real LGBT winners here would be MtF transgenders who could finally do another thing previously only available to people born with female reproductive organs.

      I like inclusivity IRL and I’m happy with Unicode’s support for ancient/artificial languages but frankly, the variations per emoji are pushing my comfort zone. Gendered language is thankfully on its way out, why all the separate emoji then? Most don’t warrant gendered versions imo because there is not much difference between them anyway. I’d prefer silhouette or yellow presentations in line with faces like 😀 and pictograms like 🫂🗣️ (plus lots of non-emoji ones). Yes, there should be a male and female face and body, skirt dancer and a tuxedo one, same with wedding attire and perhaps breastfeeding/bottle feeding, but just a gender and skin tone neutral variation for actions 🙌💁💇🚶🧑‍🦽🤳🧏🤷🧑‍💻🕵️🦸 is enough. In reality, there isn’t a gendered 👶 baby, 🤠 cowboy or ⛷️ skier, either, so consistency would actually improve. With all the variations, too much effort is being put into tiny, text-accompanying pictures that are supposed to represent a simple idea.

      Edit: added bold sentence

      • @MotoAsh
        link
        419 days ago

        I was saying it should happen to troll the bigots, not as some idea that the future requires gender.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          319 days ago

          The last paragraph is just my own rambling about Unicode. It was me who brought emoji into this.

      • @MotoAsh
        link
        619 days ago

        I specifically cited Junior as an example of what I meant, don’t be a “well aktually” dumbass.

    • The Pantser
      link
      219 days ago

      The enormous risk for a man to be given those organs really outweighs the benefits. The surgery to implant them, the anti rejection drugs, then the need to deliver the baby by cesarean so another surgery. Other than to say you are the mother and father at the same time why would anyone go through with that?

      • @MotoAsh
        link
        219 days ago

        To anger the bigots.

        /s I don’t know. I don’t even know why cis people decide to have kids. Besides the whole birth thing, they’re a shitload of work in a world becoming increasingly hostile to child rearing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      118 days ago

      What reasons are you talking about? I don’t really see a surgically transplanted uterus as being an argument for anything.