• TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    Vapes are already banned indoors in most places, basically everywhere smoking is banned. The issue with vapes is a lack of enforcement.

    Frankly, I think vapes should be allowed in certain areas indoors, provided they are segregated from others. Vapes are drastically less unhealthy than smoking, to the point where being outside in the cold is probably a greater health risk.

    • @Z3k3
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You say that. But as we are talking risks to others it catches me in a way that about 50% of the time it triggers an asthma episode.

      Don’t k ow about you but I kind of like unrestricted breathing

      Edit forgot to add in this stage of the vape life cycle cigarettes were advertised with health benefits. While I don’t doubt it’s better than smoking the jury is still out on long term effects

      https://www.history.com/news/cigarette-ads-doctors-smoking-endorsement

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        I’m all for more study into the long term effects, and don’t think that vaping is completely harmless or that it necessarily has positive effects. However nothing is truly harmless, and many people are considered well within their rights to do things that have the potential to cause harm to themselves - or even others. Driving, for example, carries a significant risk, and even cycling could create a situation where you crash into another person and injur them.

        I just think that allowing vaping rooms indoors would be a better solution for everyone. People who vape get to keep warm, while people who want to breathe unrestricted air could find themselves better off because the vapers are indoors and out their way.

        • @Z3k3
          link
          English
          13 months ago

          Ahh I think you mean like the old idea of smoking break rooms, which sure everyone in there is by choice and accepts any risk.

          I dont think your analogy of driving a car fits as driving has utility it reminds me of my yank friends arguing we should allow guns or ban knives because to do otherwise is hypocritical or something

          • TWeaK
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Ahh I think you mean like the old idea of smoking break rooms

            Yes pretty much. This was discussed and rejected in the UK when the smoking bans came in, however other places in Europe implemented indoor smoking just fine. As vaping is a lesser harm than smoking, and in particular vapors don’t linger like smoke does, it should be easier to implement. But UK politicians wants to maintain a hardline ban in spite of any rational reasoning.

            I dont think your analogy of driving a car fits

            It was just the first thing that came to mind, which is why I threw in cycling as well. Cycling is often done for recreation rather than utility, but does still carry risk to others nearby. Cars also pollute, though, which is a similar harm to smoking, yet people are against outright banning combustion vehicles. It generally boils down to “I do it, and I shouldn’t be banned, but I don’t do that other thing so that should be banned.”

            For the record I don’t even smoke, in fact tobacco smoke makes me feel sick. But I don’t think people should be outright prohibited, not when a reasonable compromise can be reached.

            • @Z3k3
              link
              English
              13 months ago

              The way the UK government has handled the whole smoking thing is a joke either fuckinhg ban it or don’t. The way they are doing it while helping in some ways makes it better in others it makes it worse as you have pointed out.

              I just want to get my shopping without worrying about random asthma attacks