@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year ago“United in diversity” :3lemmy.mlimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1109arrow-down126
arrow-up183arrow-down1image“United in diversity” :3lemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squareSaltyIceteaMakerlinkfedilink7•1 year agoYes it is. Of course a cahsier or a car salesperson shouldn’t be forced to appear “neutral” but i think political figured and anything law (judges police etc.) Should always appear as neutral as possible
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink2•1 year agoThe neutrality of law enforcing authorities is beyond the scope of this discussion, since the court’s ruling concerns private enterprises. By your logic, I hear that you actually disagree with the court’s ruling.
minus-squareSaltyIceteaMakerlinkfedilink1•1 year agoi guess? lets put it like this: anything government, law etc. = should be as neutral as possible anything private = should not be forced to hide their beliefs in my opinion anyway
Yes it is. Of course a cahsier or a car salesperson shouldn’t be forced to appear “neutral” but i think political figured and anything law (judges police etc.) Should always appear as neutral as possible
The neutrality of law enforcing authorities is beyond the scope of this discussion, since the court’s ruling concerns private enterprises.
By your logic, I hear that you actually disagree with the court’s ruling.
i guess?
lets put it like this: anything government, law etc. = should be as neutral as possible
anything private = should not be forced to hide their beliefs
in my opinion anyway