• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    As long as their goals suite the company, sure. The endgame of Google is very clear and it doesn’t include a free and open web.

    • Hnery
      link
      fedilink
      1014 days ago

      they are making it seem just free and open enough to avoid regulation

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      414 days ago

      I don’t even think this is the case, google does a lot pretty much everywhere. one example is one of the things they are pushing for is locally run AI (gemini, stable diffusion etc.) to run on your gpu via webgpu instead of needing to use cloud services, which is obviously privacy friendly for a myriad of reasons, in fact, we now have multiple implementations of LLMs that run locally in browser on webgpu, and even a stable diffusion implementation (never got it to work though since my most beefy gpu is an arc a380 with 6gb of ram)

      they do other stuff too, but with the recent craze push for AI, I think this is probably the most relevant.

      • LeafletOP
        link
        English
        614 days ago

        LLMs are expensive to run, so locally running them saves Google money.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          214 days ago

          ehh… not really, the amount of generated data you can get by snopping on LLM traffic is going to far out weigh the costs of running LLMs

          • LeafletOP
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            There’s nothing technical stopping Google from sending the prompt text (and maybe generated results) back to their servers. Only political/social backlash for worsened privacy.