• @lepinkainen
    link
    10610 days ago

    Drunk people and consent is a moral and legal gray area - it doesn’t matter if they initiate

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2110 days ago

        It also depends on what is being consented to. We accept that drunk people can consent to commit crimes, but that they cannot consent to have sex.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2310 days ago

          If drunk people couldn’t consent as a rule then like 80% of Finnish one night stands would be double rapes (since both are getting raped by the other party) lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          410 days ago

          And the old “I cheated on you because I was drunk”. It’s not so heartwarming that people here are belittling rape with what would be considered negligent sexual assault at the worst.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            38 days ago

            I’m just pointing out a strange legal quandary. Obviously noone should fuck around with consent.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -18 days ago

            hm, yeah so if you can’t consent when drunk, then you also can’t cheat when drunk. Because it’s non consensual in both cases. (at least intentionally, so it would be a valid excuse in this case)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1210 days ago

      well if someone gets really drunk (not being drugged by others, but doing it because they want to) and commits a crime, thats still a crime they commited

      if im wrong please explain

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 days ago

      legal gray area - it doesn’t matter if they initiate

      is there a legal basis for this statement? There very well could be, i don’t do a lot of raping so i wouldn’t know anything about this lmao