@[email protected] to Vegan [email protected]English • 13 days agoRepost inspired by a true story.vegantheoryclub.orgimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1381arrow-down119
arrow-up1362arrow-down1imageRepost inspired by a true story.vegantheoryclub.org@[email protected] to Vegan [email protected]English • 13 days agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlinkEnglish2•13 days agoClaiming ownership of an animal that doesn’t (and is unable to) consent overrules careful differentiation of words and mindsets.
minus-squaremathemachristian[he]linkfedilinkEnglish5•13 days agoRight which is why I said “less harmful than shelters” it’s harm reduction not harmless
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•13 days agoWhat if the animal is born in your property and never tries to leave because it wants to stay?
minus-squaremathemachristian[he]linkfedilinkEnglish2•13 days agoWhat then? Im not sure what your trying to say here. Animal on my property are my pets? Genuinely don’t know what your hypothetical is meant to address?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•11 days agoLikely I misintepretted your post. I think I was saying its harmless in some cases not just harm reduction, but its not much point to make. Sorry!
Claiming ownership of an animal that doesn’t (and is unable to) consent overrules careful differentiation of words and mindsets.
Right which is why I said “less harmful than shelters” it’s harm reduction not harmless
What if the animal is born in your property and never tries to leave because it wants to stay?
What then? Im not sure what your trying to say here. Animal on my property are my pets? Genuinely don’t know what your hypothetical is meant to address?
Likely I misintepretted your post. I think I was saying its harmless in some cases not just harm reduction, but its not much point to make. Sorry!
No harm done 😄