The father of the teen suspected in the Georgia school shooting has been arrested, the Georgia bureau of investigation has said.

Colin Gray, 54, was arrested by the bureau in connection to the shooting at Apalachee high school. Colin is the father of Colt Gray, the 14-year-old who is suspected of fatally shooting two students and two teachers with an assault-style rifle at the high school on Wednesday.

He is charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter, two counts of second degree murder and eight counts of cruelty to children, the Georgia bureau said.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 months ago

    Absolutely untrue.

    The point, is that the most common device to do this with is ubiquitous and easy to access.

    Properly defining it, and clarifying what is being used is important to coherently discussing the issue.

    • originalucifer
      link
      fedilink
      -42 months ago

      only if you have an agenda to make some human killing devices ok and others not ok. i dont believe in such differentiation.

      they should all be heavily regulated from your garden pshooter to any single shot hunting device to full on human killing weapons regardless of automatic status.

      …but only if we want to be serious about the epidemic of the constant human deaths causes by all these devices, which is clearly almost none of us.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        When you discuss the topic of regulation you have to address availability. Ignoring the difference in availability during your discussion highlights lack of attention for the challenge.

        Calling all rifles automatic assault weapons is like saying you flew Denver to Newark on the space shuttle. It simply doesn’t make sense, and devalues the important points

      • @TheDoozer
        link
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I think you’re missing the point. Bringing in difficult to obtain weapons as part of the conversation muddies the conversation about controlling the currently ubiquitous weapons being used.

        As an analogy, let’s say someone blows something up and hurts people, using dynamite or homemade explosive using gun powder:

        “Anyone who has access to the dynamite and RPGs and C-4 should be held responsible for what’s done with it!”

        “Wait, there was an RPG or C4? I’m pretty sure outside the military it’s pretty difficult to get ahold of either of those. They’re already heavily regulated.”

        “What difference does it make? They’re explosives used to blow things up and kill people.”

        “Right, but, again, those are heavily regulated, while what happened was with dynamite, which is not.”

        “OH! So it’s OKAY since the dynamite is not as regulated!”

        “No, it’s just a different conversation about RPGs and C4.”

        “Only if you have an agenda!”

        Vs.

        “Anyone who purchases dynamite should be responsible for what happens to it, unless they can show they’ve properly secured it and didn’t give access to it to someone they shouldn’t.”

        “Agreed, dynamite and gunpowder explosives are common and not as regulated as they should be.”