@[email protected] to Data is BeautifulEnglish • 11 days agoWho Stops a "Bad Guy With a Gun"?slrpnk.netimagemessage-square281fedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down134file-text
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageWho Stops a "Bad Guy With a Gun"?slrpnk.net@[email protected] to Data is BeautifulEnglish • 11 days agomessage-square281fedilinkfile-text
More info https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/06/22/us/shootings-police-response-uvalde-buffalo.html
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•11 days agoWhere on this chart does it show casualty rate per incident?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•11 days agoJust the casualty rate of the perpetrator, not the victims.
minus-square@AdComfortable1514linkEnglish1•edit-211 days agoI count casualty_rate = number_shot / (number_shot + number_subdued) Which in this case is 22/64 = 34% casualty rate for civilians and 98/131 = 75% casualty rate for police
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 days agoAs casualty rate of the attacker, which now makes sense. I initially thought you were referring to bystander casualty of each incident, and was confused how you had any data on it.
Where on this chart does it show casualty rate per incident?
Just the casualty rate of the perpetrator, not the victims.
Ah, yes that makes sense.
I count casualty_rate = number_shot / (number_shot + number_subdued)
Which in this case is 22/64 = 34% casualty rate for civilians
and 98/131 = 75% casualty rate for police
As casualty rate of the attacker, which now makes sense. I initially thought you were referring to bystander casualty of each incident, and was confused how you had any data on it.