@renzev to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 months agoAI's take on XMLimagemessage-square140arrow-up11.26Karrow-down123cross-posted to: programmerhumor
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XML@renzev to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square140cross-posted to: programmerhumor
minus-square@FeathercrownlinkEnglish5•2 months agoThis is why there are none, but I still think it’s dumb. Parsers can’t see comments anyways.
minus-squareNekuSoullinkfedilink10•edit-22 months agoThat’s assuming people actually use a parser and don’t build their own “parser” to read values manually. And before anyone asks: Yes, I’ve known people who did exactly that and to this day I’m still traumatized by that discovery. But yes, comments would’ve been nice.
minus-square@bitjunkielink2•2 months agoA tool being flexible enough that a shitty dev can use it to make something shitty isn’t a poor reflection on the tool.
This is why there are none, but I still think it’s dumb. Parsers can’t see comments anyways.
That’s assuming people actually use a parser and don’t build their own “parser” to read values manually.
And before anyone asks: Yes, I’ve known people who did exactly that and to this day I’m still traumatized by that discovery.
But yes, comments would’ve been nice.
A tool being flexible enough that a shitty dev can use it to make something shitty isn’t a poor reflection on the tool.