@renzev to Programmer [email protected]English • 10 days agoAI's take on XMLimagemessage-square140arrow-up11.23Karrow-down123cross-posted to: programmerhumor
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XML@renzev to Programmer [email protected]English • 10 days agomessage-square140cross-posted to: programmerhumor
minus-square@actuallylink4•9 days agoOver time I have matured as a programmer and realize xml is very good to use sometimes, even superior. But I still want layers between me and it. I do output as yaml when I have to see what’s in there
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•9 days agoI see you’ve never worked with SOAP services that have half a dozen or more namespaces.
minus-square@CompostMateriallinkEnglish3•edit-210 days agoDepends on how complex it is. Ever see the XML behind SharePoint? 🤮
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•9 days agoBut is that the fault of XML, or is the data itself just complex, or did they structure the data badly? Would another human readable format make the data easier to read?
There are people who find XML hard to read?
Over time I have matured as a programmer and realize xml is very good to use sometimes, even superior. But I still want layers between me and it. I do output as yaml when I have to see what’s in there
I see you’ve never worked with SOAP services that have half a dozen or more namespaces.
Depends on how complex it is. Ever see the XML behind SharePoint? 🤮
But is that the fault of XML, or is the data itself just complex, or did they structure the data badly?
Would another human readable format make the data easier to read?