• @evulhotdog
    link
    0
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s not like giving away part of your liver is a zero sum game, now that person is at risk of infection, has lesser liver performance, and for what? Someone who has showed they will just continue to harm themselves, and others (the person they’re getting the liver from,) if you allow it?

    I don’t know any other surgeons who would do that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Has lesser liver performance? What? Do you understand how a living transplant works? You both regrow a full liver after the procedure, because livers are so regenerative you can make a full one from less than half. This makes no sense to me.

      Also she quit for 5 months after she found out she had liver failure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        It takes years for a donor’s remaining liver to grow back, and the recipient is unlikely to grow out more of the donated liver depending on comorbidities and severity of illness.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -13 months ago

      If a surgeon refused to let me save the life of the one person in the world i love then they wouldn’t be able to save any more lives after that so add that to your heartless calculations…

      • @evulhotdog
        link
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        There are very few transplant surgeons who would take the risk of a partial liver transplant which they have high likelihood of being a death sentence for the patient (not sure if you read but they need a full liver, from a cadaver, not partial,) and want to willingly throw their name in with another patient to discuss during M&M.

        This is coming directly from familiarity with the procedure, comorbidities, and other factors from a general surgeon at a top 10 hospital in the US.