FauxPseudo M to HeathcliffEnglish • 10 days agoHeathcliff without Heathcliff 9/10/2024imagemessage-square5arrow-up129arrow-down11
arrow-up128arrow-down1imageHeathcliff without Heathcliff 9/10/2024FauxPseudo M to HeathcliffEnglish • 10 days agomessage-square5
minus-squareFauxPseudo OPMlinkEnglish10•10 days agoI noticed that the colorist botched this one. The wall under Heathcliff and the upper corner of the rug where the wrong colors. This wasn’t an issue in the original. This means they aren’t recolonizing the first colorized version for reprints but starting from scratch.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•10 days agoThe original looks far better, I wonder what the point was of recolouring it?
minus-squareFauxPseudo OPMlinkEnglish6•10 days agoThey recolor anytime there’s a reprint. They use different colors so that people can know that it’s not a new one.
minus-squareFauxPseudo OPMlinkEnglish6•10 days agoWhen I searched for the original, I also found this one dated the same day. This is straight up '70s coloring and I don’t know if they released it and then pulled it or if something else happened.
I noticed that the colorist botched this one. The wall under Heathcliff and the upper corner of the rug where the wrong colors.
This wasn’t an issue in the original. This means they aren’t recolonizing the first colorized version for reprints but starting from scratch.
The original looks far better, I wonder what the point was of recolouring it?
They recolor anytime there’s a reprint. They use different colors so that people can know that it’s not a new one.
When I searched for the original, I also found this one dated the same day. This is straight up '70s coloring and I don’t know if they released it and then pulled it or if something else happened.