• @LinkerbaanOP
    link
    -33 months ago

    The other two have proven not to be capable for the job.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      No one is “capable for” the job, it’s not a realistic responsibility. But at least the other two have approximated suitability. Trump, as poorly as he did and terrible as he is, at least has experience now. In terms of tangible evidence, they both have considerably more experience in high ranking leadership roles than Stein.

      Trump got in without experience because he had a huge cult of personality and Russian help. Kamala has held numerous high offices. What has Jill Stein done? Policy positions are nice and all, but without any record of implementation that’s useless. Why do all of these this party candidates shoot straight for President? It almost seems like they’re intentionally spoiling the vote to help Trump.

      • @LinkerbaanOP
        link
        -23 months ago

        The third party does not support Genocide that’s the base for being capable. Project harder though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          The squirrels in my backyard don’t support genocide either, which by your logic makes them equally capable as Stein.

          • TheLowestStone
            link
            33 months ago

            They also have just as much chance of being elected and fewer ties to Putin. Squirrels 2024!