• Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      158 days ago

      Please explain why Putin would endorse the person who says that Ukraine should win the war over the person who won’t say that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -118 days ago

        I don’t need to explain anything. Again, I’m just citing facts, and you’re guessing. But honestly, how much do you think your armchair analytics are really worth? Or anyone’s for that matter?

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          98 days ago

          I just cited facts too.

          Harris wants Russia out of Ukraine.

          Trump refuses to say what he wants Russia to do.

          Why would Putin sincerely endorse Harris? I think you know the answer is that he wouldn’t.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -118 days ago

            Because you, quote ‘don’t live under a rock’, was that the citation you consider a fact?

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              98 days ago

              Again:

              Harris says Ukraine should win.

              Trump will not say who should win.

              This happened last night. I heard it with my own ears.

              So, again, why would Putin support the person who wants him to lose the war? Because, again, I think you know the answer.

              • arefx
                link
                fedilink
                English
                38 days ago

                They could actually just be dumb and ignorant, but I think we both know they have their motives.

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  88 days ago

                  My source of what? Those two claims? Again, the debate last night. Putin’s obviously bullshit endorsement of Harris? I can give you a source, but I’m not sure what your whole point here is if you didn’t know about that.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    17 days ago

                    Yes, of course, your source of why Putin made the endorsement, the source I asked for about 5 comments ago…

        • YeetPics
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 days ago

          I don’t need to explain anything.

          Don’t be coy; you simply cannot.

          You exist in bad faith, this goes so far beyond debate at this point lmao

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          There’s a big difference between citing facts and citing a statement. You likely have no evidence that the statement is a fact, besides taking the ex-kgb leader of an adversarial nations word at face value, which…does sound a little silly when you say it out loud like that, doesn’t it? Keep in mind this nation has definitely messed with our elections in the past too lol.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -17 days ago

            The statement is the fact, and I put no more value to it than that. Make of that what you will, I really don’t care

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              You are citing a statement, and it is a fact that the statement was said, but the content of that statement is not a fact because there’s very little evidence to support it being a fact. Lies exist, especially from the election meddling, ex KGB foreign adversary national leader types.