• @Letsdothis
    link
    English
    -262 months ago

    I agree, and you get my upvote for a true statement.

    But also, I’m not convinced there would be more “plight” in a Russia win. I believe the opposite, in fact. I believe there would be less “plight” and suffering.

    There is very much “plight” in their protracted war over there.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate
      link
      English
      172 months ago

      So if a group of guys came to your neighbors house and told the family that they’re going to move into it with them, you wouldn’t be for removing them, even if that meant a fight? It would be better to just let them move in because that way no one gets hurt?

      And if they successfully move into your neighbor’s house, they might have eyes on your house next.

      Russia is trying to take over Ukraine, a sovereign country, by force, and other countries are trying to help Ukraine fight Russia. Yes, people on both sides are dying. Ukrainians apparently overwhelmingly believe it’s worth the fight.

    • @margaritox
      link
      English
      82 months ago

      Absolutely not true for many reasons. One of them being that if they let Russia keep what they occupied, it will give Russia time to regroup and keep going.

      Number 2, they’re torturing and killing those who don’t support the Russian regime.

      So yea, while “stopping the bloodshed” sounds good in theory (That’s why Trump keeps repeating it), it will only embolden Putin and give him time to strengthen his forces and attack again later. This is appeasement and it doesn’t work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        That would be after the low hanging fruit of Moldova. Neighbors Ukraine, Constitutionally neutral, does not admit stationing foreign military troops on its territory, can only be altered by referendum, and not at all during a state of national emergency, martial law or war.