• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17 days ago

    I can’t even imagine if I were a kid and made my parent lose access to a lot of games.

    Well it’d be just the one game that they cheated in. That’s where you can sit the kid down and tell him that cheating has consequences. Ideally this talk would’ve happened before you share access though - I’m thinking of it as making sure the kid knows how to drive before you let them borrow the keys to your car.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 days ago

      I’m talking about how an account that cheats while using the shared library of a parent, would get the account of the parent in trouble.

      That’s what I took away from this whole ordeal.

      If they just lose access to that game on their own account, sure, perfectly fine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Parents just have to make sure the kid understands to not cheat before sharing the account. It might sound new to us because we never grew up with this scenario, but it seems reasonable to me.

        Again, it’s just making sure the kid is a safe driver before letting them borrow keys to the family van.

        If the ban worries you, you can just not share the games - this is strictly an upside and there’s no penalty for maintaining the status quo and not using this feature.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 days ago

          That’s stupid and too “perfect”. You can’t enforce perfect behavior onto a teenager. They are guaranteed to make mistakes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            The problem with that statement is that there’s a pretty common example that I already brought up that easily disproves it - letting the kid borrow keys to the car after they’ve shown they can drive safely.

            There’s a lot more parental liability there than some skins in a game.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                And the penalty is losing access to a fucking game, not the death of other people.

                Teenage driving proves that they can learn to be responsible enough to be trusted with the lives of others. You’re saying they can’t learn to be responsible enough with your CS skins?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 days ago

                  Yeah I hope you lose a ton of shit because you put trust in your kid, tell them to not cheat, and they cheat regardless.

                  This feature is meant for family sharing, but they take away the stupidness of a teenager. A kid can even be tricked into running funny.exe that randomly injects itself into memory spaces of programs, causing almost any anticheat to detect it.

                  Keep your stupid perfectionism out of the equitation. Kids aren’t perfect.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    06 days ago

                    Yeah I hope you lose a ton of shit because you put trust in your kid, tell them to not cheat, and they cheat regardless.

                    And I hope your child is trusted enough to drive at some point, because you invested the time and effort to trust them behind the wheel.

                    I’ve had my steam account forever, so I might be overlooking something I did early on and forgot about, But I think the problem with anything along the lines of what you’re proposing is that they don’t have the time or ability to confirm that each steam account does belong to a different individual. This would either result in super intrusive amounts of data collecting, or risk someone saying “oops, look at that, my 15th child just got banned for hacking!” And then adding yet another “family member”?

                    Where do you draw the line in the above scenario? At least the current policy is clear.