• @AbouBenAdhem
    link
    English
    70
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The legal definitions can be far removed from normal usage: in California “lynching” is when a crowd forcibly removes a suspect from police custody, which historically was often a prelude to what we would recognize as actual lynching (presumably it was defined that way so participants could be charged even if they were stopped before harming the victim). But it’s been used in more recent times to charge protesters with “lynching” for interfering with the arrest of other protesters.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      244 days ago

      That is interesting that it has bespoke legal definitions. The Wikipedia entry is what I expected

      Lynching is an extrajudicial killing by a group. It is most often used to characterize informal public executions by a mob in order to punish an alleged transgressor, punish a convicted transgressor, or intimidate people. It can also be an extreme form of informal group social control, and it is often conducted with the

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        94 days ago

        Yes, legal definitions vary a lot by jurisdiction. “Assault and battery” is probably the most varied. Some places they’re two separate things.

      • @StaticFalconar
        link
        33 days ago

        I guess based on that definition, since it wasn’t proven yet that a group of people did this, it does not meet the criteria.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          A group could be three dudes in Klan robes. I haven’t seen anything yet indicating that applies here. But the history of Deep South racism is also a history of terrorism. It only takes three homicidal maniacs to terrify a county.