It makes more sense to me to have the switches appear as red when the device has the ability to record you. When color is used as an indicator for something, the general convention is that red is negative. Meaning that there is a greater possibility of something going wrong when a red indicator is being displayed. You could argue that “webcam is not working for some reason” is a negative, and that seeing the bright red indicator can bring your attention to the switch as a hint to how to fix the issue. I would argue against that by stating that having a webcam record you when you do not want it to is a much bigger potential negative than the webcam not recording when you do want it to.

Also:

  • When a traditional video camera displays a red indicator light, that means the camera is recording.
  • On the underside of the Framework 16, the expansion module latches are red when disengaged

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    55 days ago

    I guess the disconnect here is that I expect the default state here to be disconnected. More often than not, I am not using my mic/webcam. So when I do, I change the switch to its secondary state to enable it.

    • @computergeek125
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I can definitely see your position on this - and from a security minded perspective, it makes perfect sense. I too operate with mic/camera disabled to be my laptop default.

      We just happen to be living in a precedent where the “muted” state by common knowledge is red, so FW would design for the “global” average.