SbisasCostlyTurnover to

United [email protected]English • 1 year ago

Using agency workers to cover strikes found to be unlawful

141

Using agency workers to cover strikes found to be unlawful

SbisasCostlyTurnover to

United [email protected]English • 1 year ago

Using agency staff to cover strikes ruled unlawful

Bosses can no longer use agency staff to cover striking workers during walkouts, the High Court rules.

Big win for the Unions, and for our collective rights to organise here.

Chat

BarqsHasBite
link
fedilink
English
-1•1 year ago
At this point I think you’re being intentionally obtuse.
- @[email protected]
  link
  fedilink
  English
  1•1 year ago
  Wow, I think the same thing about you!

United [email protected]

[email protected]

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

112 users / day
539 users / week
2.16K users / month
5.56K users / 6 months
4.09K subscribers
2.04K Posts
18.7K Comments
Modlog