60 million apps keep getting pushed on us, and everyone wants their own… Every restaurant, gorcery store, etc.

Would it not be feasible to install all of those Kroger, Gas Stations, bloat, bloat, bloat apps on an app Server that we just have a remote access to them like a thin client from our phone in a singular app of shortcuts (look like a folder, directory) So all the apps stay installed and don’t use resources on the phone. Which keeps storage requirements down on the local device and means when you go into another device you can just log in and have access to all the apps already signed in and how you left them.

Does anyone know if there is already such a setup?

It wouldn’t work well with things like streaming services, but it could still cover a lot of day to day apps I don’t really want to have to have on my device.

  • @LifeInMultipleChoiceOP
    link
    1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If you want to get deals for the grocery store you need their app, cheaper deals for pizza, have to open the dominos/Pizza Hut app, I rarely go to Taco Bell, Starbucks, McDonald’s, Burger King, Wendy’s, etc but they all want you to use their app to get access to their coupons and order things. Maybe their points all add up on their websites, would just have to save all the logins in a password manager. Kroger comes to mind because they now use in store prices, price with Kroger card, and price with coupon from mobile app. It’s crazy that that is allowed, but if they are going to charge 3.99 for a watermelon if you have the mobile app, and 6.99 regular, unfortunately I will cave and install the app.

    Edit: seeing a product for sale with 3 prices listed below it is mildly infuriating

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If you want to get deals for the grocery store you need their app

      That’s because they want to get their app on your phone so that they can perform data-mining using the data that the app can get from the phone environment.

      I mean, I don’t think that it’s worth bothering with trying to game the system. I’m not going to give them my data, and I don’t really care about the discount that they’re offering for it. But if you want to do so, you can probably run an Android environment on a server and use the equivalent of RDP or VNC or something to reach it remotely.

      grabs a random example

      https://waydro.id/

      A container-based approach to boot a full Android system on regular GNU/Linux systems running Wayland based desktop environments.

      Need to connect that up to VNC or RDP somehow if it doesn’t have native support.

      EDIT: I think that I’d take a hard look at how much it’s likely to save you relative to how much time and effort you’re going to spend on setting up and maintaining this, though.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoiceOP
        link
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah that might be a good way of doing it, maybe someone else will pop in saying theyve tried one of them, I should have probably asked this on no stupid questions. I figure someone has already done it before so maybe they’ll throw some insight about what to avoid. Thanks for the input!

    • @damnthefilibuster
      link
      22 months ago

      Part of what you’ve described is market economics. They want your loyalty and they want to track your purchases to sell that data to advertisers. Do they need an app for that? Absolutely not. They can and do host websites with the same deals and all you have to do is login. The reason they push you to their app is because either the app is something they spent a bunch of money on and want to increase customer adoption. Or, they have added massive new tracking capabilities and want to spy on their users on behalf of advertisers, so they need you on their app.

      None of this is related to the technical aspects of this question. In fact, most of these companies would resist you installing their app on an “app server” simply because then they wouldn’t be able to track your location and other phone details easily. Defeating the purpose of your idea.

      Oh, and as for the watermelon - there’s a sweet spot between the prices which is usually $5 if you use their loyalty card and not their app. That’s the price you pay for your phone’s privacy and resources - a buck. Not a fair trade, but it is what it is.

      p.s. I hear you about the three prices thing. It’s frustrating. Grocery shopping is not simple. It’s all about hunting for deals and accepting the time vs money trade off. I’m sorry you are in this situation. I am too.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoiceOP
        link
        12 months ago

        Yeah, the location data wouldn’t function right as you said. They wouldn’t know you were at the store on 5th Street if the app is running on a machine at home I suppose. Could always manually search it.

        Not your fault we are in that situation. Hope your life comes into many a cheap watermelon.

        • andyburke
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Part of the reason for all this bullshit is people will just do it instead of going to a different place that doesn’t require bullshit but maybe costs a little more. 🤷‍♂️

          This seems like your bed? If you’re not willing to go to a place that doesn’t do this to you, I guess you just gotta lie in it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        It’s also what the phone number club card has been about for the past few decades. I still type in the public phone number for my local store every time (after noticing that’s what the clerk used one time when I was “having trouble” entering my number on the pin pad). Grocery app on my phone? Hell no.