• @Serinus
    link
    173 months ago

    I feel betrayed that a democrat administration pushed to repeal that ban.

    I guess you can feel a little less betrayed.

    Today, the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled 6-3 under its conservative supermajority that a bump stock attachment does not convert a semiautomatic rifle into a machine gun, which is prohibited under federal law. Under this decision, civilians now have access to bump stocks again.

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-strikes-down-bump-stock-ban

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Hmm.

      I think that this isn’t actually of massive significance, looking at this summary:

      https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/06/scotus_6-14.pdf

      That is, it sounds like the argument was over whether the ATF was granted authority by Congress under the GCA to issue such a ban, rather than whether the GCA passed constitutional muster.

      I mean, okay, it has an impact, but it isn’t really on par with cases evaluating whether law is in conformance with the First Amendment.

      • @Serinus
        link
        153 months ago

        Either way, it certainly wasn’t a Democratic administration pushing for them to be unbanned.