• @saltesc
    link
    -312 days ago

    That’s not how that happened, but okay.

    • @thrawn
      link
      112 days ago

      I bet “that’s not what happened” with zero elaboration has a single digit success rate

      • @saltesc
        link
        11 day ago

        It was explaimed in detail from day one, the actions of all security involved, who was responsible for what, and the timeline of events and interactions. Obviously there isn’t an unlimited secret service arsenal and army travelling the countryside with former presidents, packing planefuls of sniper teams and other special units.

        You need that elaborated on? All the information is the same as it has been https://duckduckgo.com

        • @thrawn
          link
          219 hours ago

          Nah don’t care, that subject itself doesn’t affect or interest me. Just saying that you convinced no one and that your comment provided no value besides a few upvotes for me, which don’t even matter on this site. I also intended it more for others who might be inclined to do the same thing rather than you yourself.

          If you actually ever want to change minds or prevent the spread of misinformation (which I’m still not convinced it is because again, you provided no evidence and I still don’t care), it’s a good idea to actually elaborate instead of just saying “not true”. The only people convinced by empty comments like yours will be convinced the other way by the next evidence-free claim.

          Btw I genuinely don’t see how the info would change my life for the better so if you are gonna start trying now, just edit it into your og comment or something, I probably won’t be back in this thread again

          • @saltesc
            link
            13 hours ago

            That was an extensive way of saying you roam around making quips at others with disinterest of context and little concern.for much else. How charming.