🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to [email protected] • 3 days agoAnon starts asking questionssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square110fedilinkarrow-up1666arrow-down113
arrow-up1653arrow-down1imageAnon starts asking questionssh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to [email protected] • 3 days agomessage-square110fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•2 days agoEveryone is wrong. It’s the encabulation effect.
minus-square@ngwoolinkEnglish3•2 days agoModern bicycles include an isotropic harmonization manifold to achieve the same thing without an encabulator.
minus-square@BowtiesAreCoollink3•2 days agoWell they took 6 hydrocomptic marzel vains, and fitted them carefully to the ambiphasiant lunar wainshaft. This effectively prevents side fumbling.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 days agoI’m looking through google scholar and I can’t seem to dig up anything about this. Could you express the principle in terms of stilted Newton pentameter?
Everyone is wrong. It’s the encabulation effect.
Modern bicycles include an isotropic harmonization manifold to achieve the same thing without an encabulator.
How do they account for side fumbling?
Well they took 6 hydrocomptic marzel vains, and fitted them carefully to the ambiphasiant lunar wainshaft. This effectively prevents side fumbling.
I’m looking through google scholar and I can’t seem to dig up anything about this.
Could you express the principle in terms of stilted Newton pentameter?