• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 months ago

    ‘Everyone anywhere’? That’s an amazingly broad statement. What’re you defining as ‘using one’? If I use ChatGPT to rewrite a paragraph, should I be fired? What about if a non native speaker uses it to remove grammatical errors from an email, should they be fired? How about using it for assisting with coding errors? Or generating draft product marketing copy? Or summarising content for third parties to make it easier to understand? Still a fireable offence? How about generating insights from data? Assistance with Roadmap prioritisation? Generating summaries of meeting notes or presentations? Helping users with learning disabilities understand complex information? Or helping them with letters, emails etc? How about if it use it to remind me of tasks? Or managing my routines?

    • @TheGrandNagus
      link
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Don’t you be bringing nuance into this.

      If you used an LLM to find that mistyped variable name, you deserve to lose your job. You and your family must suffer.

      If you are blind and you use a screen reader with some AI features, you should be fired and that tech needs to be taken from you. You must suffer. Should think twice before being blind, you disabled fuck.

      Honestly we should just kill them, even. In a very painful and torturous way. AI bad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        There’s a difference between using LLMs to edit text, provide ideas or give you information that you can double check because you have the subject matter experience. Relying on it as a substitute for skill when something important is at stake like someone’s well being is reckless at best.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          Sure, but the original quote was:

          Everyone anywhere using one on the job should be fired

          There’s no nuance there it’s just AI = bad. I agree that it’s shouldn’t, in its current form, be used as a substitute for skill in important situations. You’re totally right there.

          • Don Piano
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -52 months ago

            I never said AI = bad. AI is much broader and contains worthwhile and non-plagiarized approaches.

            If it’s worth doing, do it properly.

            • Echo Dot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              No you did say that.

              Everyone anywhere using one on the job should be fired

              You said anyone using an AI in any capacity should be fired. I have heard infinitely better takes from 4-year-olds and why they need more ice cream.

              • Don Piano
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 months ago

                This is on a post about chatgpt use. Chatgpt is from the set of llms, which is a subset of ai.

                Ai is cool. The current batch of LLMs/PISS can leave.

                • @TheGrandNagus
                  link
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  You want anybody using LLMs in any capacity to lose their livelihoods. That’s very much a “AI bad” take with zero nuance.

        • @TheGrandNagus
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          That’s not what was said. What was said was anybody using it in any capacity for any job should be fired.

          Which is obviously a very, very stupid take.