@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-23 days agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up135arrow-down12
arrow-up133arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-23 days agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 day agoI don’t understand why this is called a “subset”, while clearly containing new syntax A subset would be understood by older compilers, this is a superset
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•edit-216 hours ago The goal of this proposal is to advance a superset of C++ with a rigorously safe subset. The subset is of the proposed syntax superset. Reason being because the superset also contains explicitly unsafe syntax similar to rust.
I don’t understand why this is called a “subset”, while clearly containing new syntax
A subset would be understood by older compilers, this is a superset
The subset is of the proposed syntax superset. Reason being because the superset also contains explicitly unsafe syntax similar to rust.