@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-25 months agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up137arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up135arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ blueprintwww.theregister.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • edit-25 months agomessage-square36fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•5 months agoI don’t understand why this is called a “subset”, while clearly containing new syntax A subset would be understood by older compilers, this is a superset
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•edit-25 months ago The goal of this proposal is to advance a superset of C++ with a rigorously safe subset. The subset is of the proposed syntax superset. Reason being because the superset also contains explicitly unsafe syntax similar to rust.
I don’t understand why this is called a “subset”, while clearly containing new syntax
A subset would be understood by older compilers, this is a superset
The subset is of the proposed syntax superset. Reason being because the superset also contains explicitly unsafe syntax similar to rust.