• @pyre
    link
    English
    15 months ago

    i mean the game is over of the most high profile blatant knockoffs I’ve ever seen. I believe legal evidential reasoning is “res ipsa loquitur” which is Latin for “look at this fucking thing”

    • @Mango
      link
      English
      25 months ago

      I don’t think Nintendo should get to own the concept. We’ve had dog fighting since before digital media existed.

      • @Duamerthrax
        link
        English
        15 months ago

        It’s actually based on Japanese kids who would catch beetles in the woods and make them fight. Why do you think some of the first enemies you fight are bug catchers?

        • @Mango
          link
          English
          15 months ago

          Those Japanese kids stole the idea from the dog and chicken guys. We should sue!

      • @pyre
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        it’s not the concept dude; you can’t copyright that (though you can patent very vague shit apparently, don’t get me started). plus that’s how you get genres. some their creatures look extremely similar.

        notice how we’re not talking about cassette beasts or ooblets.

        • @Mango
          link
          English
          15 months ago

          If that’s why, then why are they suing over patent infringement instead of copyright?

          • @pyre
            link
            English
            15 months ago

            they haven’t specified much so i don’t know. but palworld steals very liberally.