The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency appeal from Nevada’s Green Party seeking to include presidential candidate Jill Stein on the ballot in the battleground state.

The Supreme Court has rejected an emergency appeal from Nevada’s Green Party seeking to include presidential candidate Jill Stein on the ballot in the battleground state.

The court’s order Friday, without any noted dissents, allows ballot preparation and printing to proceed in Nevada without Stein and other Green Party candidates included.

The outcome is a victory for Democrats who had challenged the Greens’ inclusion on the ballot in a state with a history of extremely close statewide races. In 2020, President Joe Biden outpaced former President Donald Trump by fewer than 35,000 votes in the state.

  • @[email protected]
    4•6 hours ago

    Democrats applaud bc she is another Republican plant. They like doing that. If you want to vote for her, you still can. Democracy

    • @blazeraEnglish
      -2•6 hours ago

      No, you cant, most states including nevada do not allow write in votes.

      • @[email protected]
        3•6 hours ago

        Most states do and it sounds like you should worry about local more then federal if that’s the case.

          • @[email protected]
            2•3 hours ago

            Per the Republican caucus they didn’t allow write-ins in Nevada. Looking at your post, those people will not help you. You should be looking for an actual candidate in your state that has a chance.

            Jill Stein is not the one. She is a Putin simp. Her goal is to disrupt the Democrats chance to win. I know it sucks (I live in NC) but you need local winners for a third party. Eventually that will lead to a national third party.

            • @blazeraEnglish
              -1•3 hours ago

              Republican caucus? This is nevada state law, not party convention rules. Im talking about democracy and freedom to vote for people. You can make arguments supporting voting for your candidate or why people shouldnt vote for another. But trying to win an election by outright forbidding the ability to vote for an opponent is, sitting eerily well with people.

              • @[email protected]
                2•2 hours ago

                Sounds like the secretary of the state fucked you. Not sure when they banned write-ins ( Every state should have it.)

                I still stand by my main point, third parties need to put an effort in local elections to change the laws. You never hear about them during mid-terms. They only want the presidency and that will never happen.

            • @blazeraEnglish
              -2•4 hours ago

              Yall should be embarassed for having such anti-evidence attitudes. Its a core aspect of having informed political discussion.